From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268121AbUHKRMJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:12:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268123AbUHKRMJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:12:09 -0400 Received: from imladris.demon.co.uk ([193.237.130.41]:55054 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268121AbUHKRMG (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:12:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:11:42 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tomas Szepe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Stephen Hemminger , James Ketrenos , Pavel Machek , Jeff Chua , netdev@oss.sgi.com, kernel list Subject: Re: ipw2100 wireless driver Message-ID: <20040811181142.A30309@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Tomas Szepe , Stephen Hemminger , James Ketrenos , Pavel Machek , Jeff Chua , netdev@oss.sgi.com, kernel list References: <20040810075558.A14154@infradead.org> <20040810101640.GF9034@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <4119F203.1070009@linux.intel.com> <20040811114437.A27439@infradead.org> <411A478E.1080101@linux.intel.com> <20040811093043.522cc5a0@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040811163333.GE10100@louise.pinerecords.com> <20040811175105.A30188@infradead.org> <20040811170208.GG10100@louise.pinerecords.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040811170208.GG10100@louise.pinerecords.com>; from szepe@pinerecords.com on Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:02:08PM +0200 X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by phoenix.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:02:08PM +0200, Tomas Szepe wrote: > Agreed. But the point is, in the actual case of ipw2100, will the removal > of 40 or so lines of code justify killing the functionality for those (lots) > that use it? Yes.