From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268183AbUHKTTY (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:19:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268187AbUHKTTY (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:19:24 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:35782 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268183AbUHKTTF (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:19:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:12:36 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Jesse Barnes Cc: linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] add PCI ROMs to sysfs Message-ID: <20040811181236.GD14979@kroah.com> References: <20040806211413.77833.qmail@web14926.mail.yahoo.com> <200408111004.02995.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <20040811172800.GB14979@kroah.com> <200408111102.10689.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408111102.10689.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:02:10AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wednesday, August 11, 2004 10:28 am, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:04:02AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > On Friday, August 6, 2004 2:14 pm, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > > Please check the code out and give it some testing. It will probably > > > > needs some adjustment for other platforms. > > > > > > Jon, this works on my machine too. Greg, if it looks ok can you pull it > > > in? And can you add: > > > > > > * (C) Copyright 2004 Silicon Graphics, Inc. > > > * Jesse Barnes > > > > > > to pci-sysfs.c if you do? > > > > Care to send me a new patch? Oh, and that copyright line needs to look > > like: > > * Copyright (c) 2004 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Jesse Barnes > > > > to make it legal, or so my lawyers say :) > > But I'm not the copyright holder, Silicon Graphics is, I just wanted people to > know who to harass if something breaks :). That's fine. It's the "Copyright (c) 2004" order and exact "(c)" that really matters, from what I have been told to do. thanks, greg k-h