From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268578AbUHLOcb (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:32:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268579AbUHLOcb (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:32:31 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:15770 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268578AbUHLOc2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:32:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:28:43 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Greg KH Cc: Jesse Barnes , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] add PCI ROMs to sysfs Message-ID: <20040812012843.GA2122@dmt.cyclades> References: <20040806211413.77833.qmail@web14926.mail.yahoo.com> <200408111004.02995.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <20040811172800.GB14979@kroah.com> <200408111102.10689.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <20040811181236.GD14979@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040811181236.GD14979@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:12:36AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:02:10AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 11, 2004 10:28 am, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:04:02AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > On Friday, August 6, 2004 2:14 pm, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > > > Please check the code out and give it some testing. It will probably > > > > > needs some adjustment for other platforms. > > > > > > > > Jon, this works on my machine too. Greg, if it looks ok can you pull it > > > > in? And can you add: > > > > > > > > * (C) Copyright 2004 Silicon Graphics, Inc. > > > > * Jesse Barnes > > > > > > > > to pci-sysfs.c if you do? > > > > > > Care to send me a new patch? Oh, and that copyright line needs to look > > > like: > > > * Copyright (c) 2004 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Jesse Barnes > > > > > > to make it legal, or so my lawyers say :) > > > > But I'm not the copyright holder, Silicon Graphics is, I just wanted people to > > know who to harass if something breaks :). > > That's fine. It's the "Copyright (c) 2004" order and exact "(c)" that > really matters, from what I have been told to do. Greg, That made me curious, what is the rationale behind (C) Copyright 2004 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Jesse Barnes works and the previous suggested (C) Copyright 2004 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Jesse Barnes doesnt? I know its a bit offtopic, but still, if you know the reason, would be great to hear :) Bet others will also like to hear that. Thanks!