From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>
Cc: Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
Linux kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:58:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040812035854.GA3556@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Xine.LNX.4.44.0408112120320.15343-100000@dhcp83-76.boston.redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 09:23:19PM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Kurt Garloff wrote:
>
> > The rest of the path is still a win IMVHO.
> >
> > Unfortunately, it has not been discussed here yet.
>
> Defaulting to the capability module is a separate discussion. I
> personally don't have a strong opinion on this issue.
>
> Chris, Stephen, Greg? :-)
I don't really care. But I think almost every LSM module so far really
wants the capabilities module at the same time, right? Maybe we should
make it easier to do that than what is necessary today.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-12 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-10 8:57 [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks Kurt Garloff
2004-08-10 13:29 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:23 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-10 20:27 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:43 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-11 1:55 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 14:16 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 15:02 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-10 19:22 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:00 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-10 20:07 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:12 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-10 20:31 ` James Morris
2004-08-11 8:47 ` David Mosberger
2004-08-11 15:25 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-11 18:12 ` David Mosberger
2004-08-11 18:16 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-11 22:22 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-08-12 1:23 ` James Morris
2004-08-12 3:58 ` Greg KH [this message]
2004-08-12 18:15 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-12 18:17 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-16 14:19 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-08-11 22:19 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-08-12 1:20 ` James Morris
2004-08-12 2:03 ` Kurt Garloff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040812035854.GA3556@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=kurt@garloff.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox