From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267520AbUHPKQo (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 06:16:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267514AbUHPKQo (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 06:16:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:28859 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267515AbUHPKPX (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 06:15:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:14:26 +0200 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Keith Whitwell Cc: Dave Airlie , dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: DRM and 2.4 ... Message-ID: <20040816101426.GB31696@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <1092640312.2791.6.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <412081C6.20601@tungstengraphics.com> <20040816094622.GA31696@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <412088A5.6010106@tungstengraphics.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <412088A5.6010106@tungstengraphics.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 11:12:53AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Most of the abstractions that you're complaining about existed prior to the > addition of freebsd support DRM_IOCTL_ARGS, DRM_ERR, DRM_CURRENTPID, DRM_UDELAY, DRM_READMEMORYBARRIER, DRM_COPY_FROM_USER_IOCTL etc etc existed prior to freebsd support? Oh my god... --i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBIIkBxULwo51rQBIRAiGGAJ9IUDUqXya3xBDYWrA6rdgyD/LmuwCdFd5I i/mV4gjY+c7HzIB7uODrRpk= =jWXK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ--