From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267647AbUHPNfq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:35:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267626AbUHPNfq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:35:46 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:49364 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267630AbUHPNd3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:33:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 08:54:15 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Gerd Knorr Cc: Devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: patch_kraxel-2.4.26 in kernel 2.4.27 Message-ID: <20040816115415.GA14656@logos.cnet> References: <20040805161923.4e2e2147.devel@integra-sc.it> <20040805224109.GB18155@logos.cnet> <20040816110501.GR2701@bytesex> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040816110501.GR2701@bytesex> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:05:01PM +0200, Gerd Knorr wrote: > On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 07:41:09PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 04:19:23PM +0200, Devel wrote: > > > The path patch_kraxel-2.4.26 from http://dl.bytesex.org/patches/ will be included into kernel 2.4.27? > > > Thanks by now! > > > > Nope, it wont. A quick look shows it touches a hell lot of stuff. > > It basically brings v4l(2) of the 2.4.26 kernel to 2.6 level, including > the v4l2 API + new drivers (which depend on v4l2). > > > We should probably try to merge the sane bits? Gerd? > > I'm not going to submit v4l2 for 2.4, people better should go with 2.6 > of they need it. The only bits I can think of merging are the updates > for bttv-cards.c, i.e. support for some new tv cards. New cards are > rare these days through as new cards usually don't use bt878-based > designs any more. Also it is low priority on my todo list and I'm just > back from two weeks holiday with alot of pending stuff, so don't expect > me looking at this soon (maybe not at all). Fine!