From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267970AbUHPWIW (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:08:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267972AbUHPWIW (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:08:22 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:226 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267970AbUHPWIV (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:08:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:06:41 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Alan Cox Cc: ecki-news2004-05@lina.inka.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux SATA RAID FAQ Message-Id: <20040816150641.108c66a6.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1092315392.21994.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1092315392.21994.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > I'm currently trying to fix up the IT8212 which is an older PATA board > which does have real h/w raid 0/1 I'm sitting on the vendor's driver for these cards. How does your work differ from this? hch questioned why we need the driver at all: just put the card in JBOD mode and use s/w raid drivers. But the thing does have an on-board CPU and the idea is that by offloading to that, the data transits the bus just a single time. The developers are off doing some comparative benchmarking at present.