From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267725AbUHPP2S (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:28:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267775AbUHPP2O (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:28:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:2538 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267721AbUHPP1z (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:27:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:26:57 -0400 From: Alan Cox To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Alan Cox , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: PATCH: header updates for IDE changes Message-ID: <20040816152657.GB10279@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20040815145515.GA9993@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <200408161708.04376.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408161708.04376.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 05:08:04PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > These changes belong to the patches making actual use of them... They just don't split along those lines and compile sanely. I did the entire thing as one operation because for a lot of it there are no middle grounds. > BTW What is the ordering in which your patches should be applied? Time order of message sending. I guess I should have added a PATCH n of m to it but didn't realise in time. While I've split them up for ease of understanding its likely a few steps along the way don't yield working IDE because of the interdependancies. Alan