From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268108AbUHQFKG (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 01:10:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268111AbUHQFKG (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 01:10:06 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:59332 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268108AbUHQFKA (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 01:10:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:08:16 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Jeff Dike Cc: kai@germaschewski.name, sam@ravnborg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] 2.6.8-rc4-mm1 - Fix UML build Message-Id: <20040816220816.1b30fd53.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200408170602.i7H62LNj019126@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200408120414.i7C4EtJd010481@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20040815150635.5ac4f5df.akpm@osdl.org> <200408170602.i7H62LNj019126@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Dike wrote: > > Here is a fixed fix-build patch, against 2.6.8.1-mm1. Thanks. Where do we stand now with getting all this stuff merged up? Are the patches in -mm suitable? Did the controversial blockdev stuff get cleaned up? (it looks like it did...).