From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268370AbUHQSGv (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:06:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268369AbUHQSGr (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:06:47 -0400 Received: from gprs214-122.eurotel.cz ([160.218.214.122]:8321 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268363AbUHQSGN (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:06:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:03:13 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mochel@digitalimplant.org Subject: Re: swsusp: fix default and merge upstream? Message-ID: <20040817180313.GD19009@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20040817111128.GA4164@elf.ucw.cz> <20040817104745.683581dd.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040817104745.683581dd.akpm@osdl.org> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Perhaps now is the right time to merge -mm swsusp up to Linus? > > I suppose so. The way to do that is for Pat to merge up the various > patches which are hanging around and then ask Linus to do the bk pull. -mm plus two patches I sent today works pretty much okay. Are they swsusp-related things in your tree that are not in patrick's bk? driver-tree changes (enums etc) are pretty much orthogonal and can go in anytime later. > What's the testing status of the new code in bk-power.patch? Works for me, some users reported success (after being advised to use "shutdown" method), and suse pulled it into internal tree and it got basic testing there by Stefan. I guess that counts like "pretty well tested". Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!