public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC64 Fix unbalanced pci_dev_put in EEH code
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:25:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040818172501.GF14002@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16674.53330.174867.75311@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>

Hi Paul,

Hang on there, you didn't just rename the variable, you also missed a
teeny chunk of the original patch.  The corrected path is attached below.
(Well, I rather liked my original var names better, but whatever).

--linas

Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas <linas@linas.org>

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 01:43:14PM +1000, Paul Mackerras was heard to remark:
> The EEH code currently can end up doing an extra pci_dev_put() in the
> case where we hot-unplug a card for which we are ignoring EEH errors
> (e.g. a graphics card).  This patch fixes that problem by only
> maintaining a reference to the PCI device if we have entered any of
> its resource addresses into our address -> PCI device cache.  This
> patch is based on an earlier patch by Linas Vepstas.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> 


===== arch/ppc64/kernel/eeh.c 1.28 vs edited =====
--- 1.28/arch/ppc64/kernel/eeh.c	Mon Jul 12 18:29:16 2004
+++ edited/arch/ppc64/kernel/eeh.c	Wed Jul 14 15:40:47 2004
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@
 static void __pci_addr_cache_insert_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	struct device_node *dn;
+	int inserted = 0;
 	int i;
 
 	dn = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev);
@@ -226,9 +227,6 @@
 #endif
 		return;
 	}
-
-	/* The cache holds a reference to the device... */
-	pci_dev_get(dev);
 
 	/* Walk resources on this device, poke them into the tree */
 	for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) {
@@ -242,6 +242,12 @@
 		if (start == 0 || ~start == 0 || end == 0 || ~end == 0)
 			 continue;
 		pci_addr_cache_insert(dev, start, end, flags);
+		inserted = 1;
+	}
+
+	/* The cache holds a reference to the device... */
+	if (inserted) {
+		pci_dev_get (dev);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -265,6 +270,7 @@
 static inline void __pci_addr_cache_remove_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	struct rb_node *n;
+	int removed = 0;
 
 restart:
 	n = rb_first(&pci_io_addr_cache_root.rb_root);
@@ -275,13 +281,16 @@
 		if (piar->pcidev == dev) {
 			rb_erase(n, &pci_io_addr_cache_root.rb_root);
 			kfree(piar);
+			removed = 1;
 			goto restart;
 		}
 		n = rb_next(n);
 	}
 
 	/* The cache no longer holds its reference to this device... */
-	pci_dev_put(dev);
+	if (removed) {
+	   pci_dev_put(dev);
+	}
 }
 
 /**

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-18 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-18  3:43 [PATCH] PPC64 Fix unbalanced pci_dev_put in EEH code Paul Mackerras
2004-08-18 17:25 ` Linas Vepstas [this message]
2004-08-19  1:04   ` Paul Mackerras
2004-08-19 15:35     ` Linas Vepstas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040818172501.GF14002@austin.ibm.com \
    --to=linas@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox