From: Terence Ripperda <tripperda@nvidia.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Terence Ripperda <tripperda@nvidia.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Michael Geithe <warpy@gmx.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.8.1-mm2 (nvidia breakage)
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:58:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040819225848.GE1263@hygelac> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408191603.55327.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Thanks Bjorn,
I'll move that call to pci_enable_device to earlier in the probe call.
but in Kevin's original email, he's hitting an oops within the
pci_enable_device call. is that likely due to pci_enable_device being
called late?
Thanks,
Terence
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 04:03:55PM -0600, bjorn.helgaas@hp.com wrote:
> On Thursday 19 August 2004 3:51 pm, Terence Ripperda wrote:
> > the original bug report was during module load time, when we're
> > probing our devices via the pci_driver's probe callback. this is well
> > before we hook up interrupts or do anything in our closed source code.
> >
> > I'm attaching a trimmed down version of our driver that pretty much
> > only does this probe (complete source is included). I don't know if
> > this will reproduce the original bug or not.
>
> Thanks, this is enough to show the problem:
>
> nv_kern_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, ...)
> {
> ...
> nv->interrupt_line = dev->irq;
> ...
> if (pci_enable_device(dev) != 0)
>
> The driver is looking at dev->irq before calling pci_enable_device().
> But dev->irq is not necessarily initialized before pci_enable_device().
>
> I'm not a PCI expert, but I'm not sure you should be looking at
> all the other dev->resource[] stuff before pci_enable_device()
> either. Most of the "modern" drivers in the tree seem to do
> pci_enable_device() very early in the probe() function, i.e.,
> see tg3.c.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-19 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040819092654.27bb9adf.akpm@osdl.org>
2004-08-19 16:51 ` 2.6.8.1-mm2 (nvidia breakage) Bjorn Helgaas
2004-08-19 17:53 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-19 21:51 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-08-19 22:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-08-19 22:22 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-19 22:58 ` Terence Ripperda [this message]
2004-08-20 15:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-08-20 16:24 ` Michael Geithe
2004-08-20 19:04 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-08-23 15:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-08-23 19:01 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-08-24 15:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-08-24 17:22 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-08-24 17:36 ` Roland Dreier
2004-08-24 22:03 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-08-24 22:35 ` 2.6.8.1-mm2 (nvidia breakage) [u] Martin Schlemmer [c]
2004-08-24 5:17 2.6.8.1-mm2 (nvidia breakage) Michael Geithe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040819225848.GE1263@hygelac \
--to=tripperda@nvidia.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=warpy@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox