From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266034AbUHTKjh (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:39:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266243AbUHTKjh (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:39:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:64917 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266034AbUHTKjg (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:39:36 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:41:07 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Lee Revell Cc: linux-kernel , Thomas Charbonnel , Florian Schmidt , Felipe Alfaro Solana Subject: Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P4 Message-ID: <20040820104107.GA20446@elte.hu> References: <20040816113131.GA30527@elte.hu> <20040816120933.GA4211@elte.hu> <1092716644.876.1.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040817080512.GA1649@elte.hu> <20040819073247.GA1798@elte.hu> <1092972918.10063.11.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040820081319.GA4321@elte.hu> <1092993242.10063.66.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040820102732.GA14622@elte.hu> <1092998028.10063.103.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1092998028.10063.103.camel@krustophenia.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Lee Revell wrote: > > well, 9 msecs is still not nice. I've been able to trigger larger than > > 10msec latencies too on a 2 GHz box. > > If this is the case then should a make -j12 have ground the machine to > a halt the way it did? well, does it slow down that much with tracing and voluntary-preempt disabled too? Ingo