From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268279AbUHTQHX (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:07:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268255AbUHTQHW (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:07:22 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:57735 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267363AbUHTQHG (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:07:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:06:05 +0200 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Rik van Riel Cc: Alan Cox , Oliver Neukum , Pete Zaitcev , Nick Piggin , Hugh Dickins , greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sct@redhat.com Subject: Re: PF_MEMALLOC in 2.6 Message-ID: <20040820160605.GH19489@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20040820150257.GC6812@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hAW+M2+FUO+onfmf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --hAW+M2+FUO+onfmf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 12:04:51PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Alan Cox wrote: > > > PF_MEMALLOC won't recurse. You might run out of memory however. > > > Are any of the VM guys considering PF_LOGALLOC so you can trace it down 8) > > No, but this thread does make me consider PF_NOIO ;) given that the task of this thread is to DO io ... ;) --hAW+M2+FUO+onfmf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBJiFsxULwo51rQBIRAhgoAJ4l9/sU2K7Q/OSEBfr52fhwq2HnsACgkSki ul7SnoHE0ifTbIjtitAm344= =Z3kC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hAW+M2+FUO+onfmf--