public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>,
	hawkes@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wli@holomorphy.com
Subject: Re: kernbench on 512p
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:36:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040820193635.GA4161@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <270470000.1092952599@flay>

On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 02:56:39PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> --On Thursday, August 19, 2004 17:24:04 -0400 Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thursday, August 19, 2004 5:11 pm, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >> The output is attached (my mailer insists on wrapping it if I inline it). 
> >> I used 'lockstat -w'.
> > 
> > The highlights:
> > 
> >  nw   spin   rjct  lock & function
> > 19.0% 81.0%    0%  dcache_lock
> >  3.3% 96.7%    0%    d_alloc+0x270
> >  2.7% 97.3%    0%    d_delete+0x40
> > 18.3% 81.7%    0%    d_instantiate+0x90
> >  4.7% 95.3%    0%    d_move+0x60
> > 34.6% 65.4%    0%    d_rehash+0xe0
> > 19.1% 80.9%    0%    dput+0x40
> > 10.5% 89.5%    0%    link_path_walk+0xef0
> >    0%  100%    0%    sys_getcwd+0x210
> > 
> > 41.4% 58.6%    0%  rcu_state
> > 61.3% 38.7%    0%    __rcu_process_callbacks+0x260
> > 41.4% 58.6%    0%    rcu_check_quiescent_state+0xf0
> > 
> > So it looks like the dcache lock is the biggest problem on this system with 
> > this load.  And although the rcu stuff has improved tremendously for this 
> > system, it's still highly contended.
> 
> Hmmm. dcache_lock is known-fucked, though I'm suprised at d_rehash
> (file deletion)?
> 

The thing which is hurting most is dput(), almost 90% of the dcache_lock 
aquistion is there.

(deleted few columns)

 23.8% 67.3%     9955785 32.7% 67.3%    0%  dcache_lock
 0.06% 70.5%       17068 29.5% 70.5%    0%    d_alloc+0x270
 0.02% 25.4%       15340 74.6% 25.4%    0%    d_delete+0x40
 0.06% 65.9%       30485 34.1% 65.9%    0%    d_instantiate+0x90
 0.06% 78.0%        4461 22.0% 78.0%    0%    d_move+0x60
 0.00%    0%           2  100%    0%    0%    d_path+0x120
 0.04% 52.5%       17068 47.5% 52.5%    0%    d_rehash+0xe0
 0.00% 26.7%          15 73.3% 26.7%    0%    d_splice_alias+0xc0
 0.00% 20.0%           5 80.0% 20.0%    0%    dentry_unhash+0x70
 0.00%    0%           4  100%    0%    0%    dentry_unhash+0xc0
 23.5% 67.5%     9827270 32.5% 67.5%    0%    dput+0x40
 0.09% 62.3%       36875 37.7% 62.3%    0%    link_path_walk+0xef0
 0.00% 0.24%        5068 99.8% 0.24%    0%    link_path_walk+0x1cc0
 0.00% 33.3%           3 66.7% 33.3%    0%    proc_pid_unhash+0x50
 0.00%  7.1%          14 92.9%  7.1%    0%    prune_dcache+0x50
 0.00%    0%         167  100%    0%    0%    prune_dcache+0x3d0
 0.00%    0%          21  100%    0%    0%    select_parent+0x40
 0.00% 24.2%        1919 75.8% 24.2%    0%    sys_getcwd+0x210



-- 
Maneesh Soni
Linux Technology Center, 
IBM Austin
email: maneesh@in.ibm.com
Phone: 1-512-838-1896 Fax: 
T/L : 6781896

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-20 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-19 16:16 kernbench on 512p Jesse Barnes
2004-08-19 16:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-19 16:29 ` David Mosberger
2004-08-19 16:37   ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-19 16:40     ` David Mosberger
2004-08-19 17:55       ` Alan Cox
2004-08-20  7:53         ` David Mosberger
2004-08-19 18:25     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-19 18:42       ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-19 21:11       ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-19 21:24         ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-19 21:56           ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-20 19:36             ` Maneesh Soni [this message]
2004-08-19 23:38           ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-08-20  0:16             ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 15:57               ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-08-20 17:24                 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 19:22                   ` Manfred Spraul
2004-08-20 20:19                   ` Manfred Spraul
2004-08-23 21:23                     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-23 23:13                       ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-10 19:01                     ` Greg Edwards
2004-09-13 18:21                       ` Manfred Spraul
2004-09-14 17:52                         ` Greg Edwards
2004-09-14 18:16                           ` Manfred Spraul
2004-09-14 18:43                             ` Greg Edwards
2004-09-14 19:16                               ` Manfred Spraul
2004-08-19 21:50         ` Ray Bryant
2004-08-19 22:00           ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-19 23:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-20 17:35   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-20  0:56 ` remove dentry_open::file_ra_init_state() duplicated memset was " Marcelo Tosatti
2004-08-20  6:21   ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-20  7:28     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-08-20  8:34       ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040820193635.GA4161@in.ibm.com \
    --to=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=hawkes@sgi.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox