* [PATCH] ppc64 mf_proc file position fix
@ 2004-08-20 20:10 Dave C Boutcher
2004-08-23 17:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave C Boutcher @ 2004-08-20 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: paulus, akpm, ipseries-list
Andrew,
arch/ppc64/kernel/mf_proc.c uses a bad interface for moving
along file position in a proc_write routine. This quit working
altogether in 2.6.8. Patch to fix. And I did a quick scan of the
kernel to see if anyone else was similarly broken...apparantly not :-)
Fixes a broken update of f_pos in a proc file write routine.
Signed off by: Dave Boutcher <sleddog@us.ibm.com>
--- linux-2.6.8.1/arch/ppc64/kernel/mf_proc.c.orig 2004-08-20 10:37:09.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.8.1/arch/ppc64/kernel/mf_proc.c 2004-08-20 14:16:01.000000000 -0500
@@ -168,22 +168,29 @@
return count;
}
-static int proc_mf_change_vmlinux(struct file *file, const char *buffer,
- unsigned long count, void *data)
+static ssize_t proc_mf_change_vmlinux(struct file *file,
+ const char __user *buf,
+ size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
+ struct inode * inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode;
+ struct proc_dir_entry * dp = PDE(inode);
int rc;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EACCES;
- rc = mf_setVmlinuxChunk(buffer, count, file->f_pos, (u64)data);
+ rc = mf_setVmlinuxChunk(buf, count, *ppos, (u64)dp->data);
if (rc < 0)
return rc;
- file->f_pos += count;
+ *ppos += count;
return count;
}
+static struct file_operations proc_vmlinux_operations = {
+ .write = proc_mf_change_vmlinux,
+};
+
static int __init mf_proc_init(void)
{
struct proc_dir_entry *mf_proc_root;
@@ -219,20 +226,7 @@
return 1;
ent->nlink = 1;
ent->data = (void *)(long)i;
-#if 0
- if (i == 3) {
- /*
- * if we had a 'D' vmlinux entry, it would only
- * be readable.
- */
- ent->read_proc = proc_mf_dump_vmlinux;
- ent->write_proc = NULL;
- } else
-#endif
- {
- ent->write_proc = proc_mf_change_vmlinux;
- ent->read_proc = NULL;
- }
+ ent->proc_fops = &proc_vmlinux_operations;
}
ent = create_proc_entry("side", S_IFREG|S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR, mf_proc_root);
--
Dave Boutcher
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ppc64 mf_proc file position fix
2004-08-20 20:10 [PATCH] ppc64 mf_proc file position fix Dave C Boutcher
@ 2004-08-23 17:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-23 18:18 ` Dave C Boutcher
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2004-08-23 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, paulus, akpm, ipseries-list
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 03:10:32PM -0500, Dave C Boutcher wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> arch/ppc64/kernel/mf_proc.c uses a bad interface for moving
> along file position in a proc_write routine. This quit working
> altogether in 2.6.8. Patch to fix. And I did a quick scan of the
> kernel to see if anyone else was similarly broken...apparantly not :-)
>
> Fixes a broken update of f_pos in a proc file write routine.
What about moving on to seq_file while you're at it? Switching from
one deprecated interface to another doesn't really sound like a worthwile
effort.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ppc64 mf_proc file position fix
2004-08-23 17:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2004-08-23 18:18 ` Dave C Boutcher
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave C Boutcher @ 2004-08-23 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, paulus, akpm, ipseries-list
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 06:54:23PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 03:10:32PM -0500, Dave C Boutcher wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > arch/ppc64/kernel/mf_proc.c uses a bad interface for moving
> > along file position in a proc_write routine. This quit working
> > altogether in 2.6.8. Patch to fix. And I did a quick scan of the
> > kernel to see if anyone else was similarly broken...apparantly not :-)
> >
> > Fixes a broken update of f_pos in a proc file write routine.
>
> What about moving on to seq_file while you're at it? Switching from
> one deprecated interface to another doesn't really sound like a worthwile
> effort.
The specific problem was on the write side, not the read side, so AFAIK,
seq_file wasn't going to help out. I started re-writing the whole file
to use seq_file for all the read stuff, and after a few hours into it I
decided to just fix the broken bit rather than gratuitously rewriting
the whole thing.
--
Dave Boutcher
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-23 18:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-08-20 20:10 [PATCH] ppc64 mf_proc file position fix Dave C Boutcher
2004-08-23 17:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-23 18:18 ` Dave C Boutcher
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox