public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Levon <levon@movementarian.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@sgi.com, anton@samba.org,
	phil.el@wanadoo.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] improve OProfile on many-way systems
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:22:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040821232206.GC20175@compsoc.man.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040821135833.6b1774a8.akpm@osdl.org>

On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 01:58:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > Anton prompted me to get this patch merged.  It changes the core buffer
> >  sync algorithm of OProfile to avoid global locks wherever possible.
> >  Anton tested an earlier version of this patch with some success. I've
> >  lightly tested this applied against 2.6.8.1-mm3 on my two-way machine.
> 
> OK.  Oprofile isn't the most commonly tested part of the kernel.  Given
> that you've "lightly tested" it,

I hammered the patch with earlier kernel versions for some time a while
ago. But that was on a 2-way, which hardly counts as proper testing.

> how do we know when it has had sufficient testing for its swim upstream?

I thought one of the points of the mm tree was to give things some
testing first.

> Does Philippe have some test suite, perhaps?

He doesn't have access to any SMP machines at all, last I heard.

regards
john

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-08-21 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-21 19:26 [PATCH] improve OProfile on many-way systems John Levon
2004-08-21 20:58 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-21 22:06   ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-21 23:14     ` John Levon
2004-08-22  4:34       ` Anton Blanchard
2004-08-24  0:07         ` John Levon
2004-08-21 23:22   ` John Levon [this message]
2004-08-21 23:36     ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-21 23:55       ` John Levon
2004-08-22  4:41         ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-22 22:42           ` John Levon
2004-08-22  3:50       ` Anton Blanchard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040821232206.GC20175@compsoc.man.ac.uk \
    --to=levon@movementarian.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=phil.el@wanadoo.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox