From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265264AbUHWBck (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Aug 2004 21:32:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265768AbUHWBck (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Aug 2004 21:32:40 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:37275 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265264AbUHWBcj (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Aug 2004 21:32:39 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 18:30:53 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Alexander Nyberg Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockmeter for x86_64 Message-Id: <20040822183053.06628fb2.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1093183598.806.9.camel@boxen> References: <1093183598.806.9.camel@boxen> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Nyberg wrote: > > This is basically a cut and paste from i386 code. > At some places however some unresolved addresses at places > like [0x1000211eb38] shows up, which is a bit weird. I'm hoping > for a comment from any of the SGI guys, as the code is so similar > to i386 I don't know if problem lies below or in the generic code. > > Against 2.6.8.1-mm2, but should apply against just about any -mm Thanks - I'll add it to -mm. If you want the SGI developers to pay attention to it, you'd better Cc them. One never knows how closely individuals monitor this list.