From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267833AbUHWUxu (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:53:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267835AbUHWUxr (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:53:47 -0400 Received: from imladris.demon.co.uk ([193.237.130.41]:40200 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267798AbUHWUqf (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:46:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:46:27 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stephen Smalley Cc: James Morris , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH][7/7] add xattr support to ramfs Message-ID: <20040823214627.A21313@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Stephen Smalley , James Morris , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , lkml References: <20040823212623.A20995@infradead.org> <1093292789.27211.279.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1093292789.27211.279.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>; from sds@epoch.ncsc.mil on Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:26:29PM -0400 X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by phoenix.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:26:29PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > What's the point on doing this for ramfs? And if you really want this > > the implementation could be shared with tmpfs easily and put into xattr.c > > For udev. Last time I checked udev required neither ramfs nor xattrs.