From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268813AbUHYVPS (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:15:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268726AbUHYVGA (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:06:00 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([207.189.100.168]:51087 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268751AbUHYVCf (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:02:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:02:20 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Rik van Riel Cc: Con Kolivas , ck kernel mailing list , linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: 2.6.8.1-ck4 Message-ID: <20040825210220.GK2793@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Rik van Riel , Con Kolivas , ck kernel mailing list , linux kernel mailing list References: <20040825205045.GI2793@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> This will be unmapped and clean; but that's not certain to be enough. >> We must ask at what cost comes aggressive caching. On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:56:53PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > Why isn't unmapped and clean enough ? We don't know that it isn't; it merely remains to be proved that it is. -- wli