From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269712AbUHZWJR (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:09:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269696AbUHZWJA (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:09:00 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:50401 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269721AbUHZWGI (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:06:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:05:46 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Nikita Danilov Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov , Hans Reiser , Andrew Morton , hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , flx@namesys.com, torvalds@osdl.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Message-ID: <20040826220546.GA12401@lst.de> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Nikita Danilov , Dmitry Baryshkov , Hans Reiser , Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , flx@namesys.com, torvalds@osdl.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com References: <20040825152805.45a1ce64.akpm@osdl.org> <412D9FE6.9050307@namesys.com> <20040826014542.4bfe7cc3.akpm@osdl.org> <412DAC59.4010508@namesys.com> <1093548414.5678.74.camel@krustophenia.net> <20040826203017.GA14361@school.ioffe.ru> <1093552692.13881.43.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <16686.22336.829096.678178@thebsh.namesys.com> <1093556818.13881.75.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <16686.24120.761440.969273@thebsh.namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16686.24120.761440.969273@thebsh.namesys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: -4.901 () BAYES_00 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 02:03:36AM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote: > > What about fs/reiser4/plugin/node/ and fs/reiser4/plugin/disk_format/? > > > > Of course you can implement another filesystem inside the plugins but > > they wouldn't use fs/reiser4/*.c, so this would be rather stupid. Right? > > > > That was the message of my message. And I think Christophe and me already agreed in this thread that these upper level plugin facility should go away before merge anyway. We made the mistake of not requesting removel of that one for XFS and now SGI blocks it's removal.