From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267554AbUH0UKs (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:10:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267370AbUH0UJF (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:09:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:62654 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267466AbUH0T4G (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:56:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:55:33 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" To: Frank van Maarseveen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: TCP listen()/accept() bug for unbound sockets? Message-Id: <20040827125533.462b32dd.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040827095640.GA27286@janus> References: <20040827095640.GA27286@janus> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:56:40 +0200 Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > is this defined behavior? Yep, we auto-bind the socket for you.