public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Luethi <rl@hellgate.ch>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [1/2][PATCH] nproc: netlink access to /proc information
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:39:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040827133947.GA23844@k3.hellgate.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040827122435.GA20334@k3.hellgate.ch>

I failed to mention that the patch is missing some rather basic locking
(say, in nproc_select_pid). Yeah, it is _that_ experimental :-/. I ignored
the locking issue when mulling over the semantics of the new interface and
forgot it later.

The patch below should be an improvement.

Roger

--- kernel/nproc.c.01	2004-08-27 15:38:36.686602557 +0200
+++ kernel/nproc.c	2004-08-27 15:38:36.686602557 +0200
@@ -278,18 +278,23 @@ int nproc_select_pid(struct nlmsghdr *nl
 
 	for (i = 0; i < tcnt; i++) {
 		task_t *tsk;
+		read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 		tsk = find_task_by_pid(pids[i]);
+		if (tsk)
+			get_task_struct(tsk);
+		read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+		if (!tsk)
+			goto err_srch;
 		pdebug("task found for pid %d: %s.\n", pids[i], tsk->comm);
-		if (!tsk) {
-			err = -ESRCH;
-			goto out;
-		}
 		err = nproc_pid_fields(nlh, fdata, len, tsk);
+		put_task_struct(tsk);
 	}
 
-out:
 	return err;
 
+err_srch:
+	return -ESRCH;
+
 err_inval:
 	return -EINVAL;
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-27 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-27 12:24 [0/2][ANNOUNCE] nproc: netlink access to /proc information Roger Luethi
2004-08-27 12:24 ` [1/2][PATCH] " Roger Luethi
2004-08-27 13:39   ` Roger Luethi [this message]
2004-08-27 12:24 ` [2/2][sample code] nproc: user space app Roger Luethi
2004-08-27 14:50 ` [0/2][ANNOUNCE] nproc: netlink access to /proc information James Morris
2004-08-27 15:26   ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-27 16:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-27 16:37   ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-27 16:41     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-27 17:01   ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-27 17:08     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 19:45   ` [BENCHMARK] " Roger Luethi
2004-08-28 19:56     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 20:14       ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-29 16:05         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 17:02           ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-29 17:20             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 17:52               ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-29 18:16                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 19:00                   ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-29 20:17                     ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-29 20:46                       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 21:45                         ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-29 22:11                           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 21:41                       ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-29 23:31                         ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-30  7:16                           ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-30 10:31                       ` Paulo Marques
2004-08-30 10:53                         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-30 12:23                           ` Paulo Marques
2004-08-30 12:28                             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-30 13:43                               ` Paulo Marques
2004-08-29 19:07               ` Paul Jackson
2004-08-29 19:17                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 19:49                   ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-29 20:25                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-31 10:16                       ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-31 15:34             ` [BENCHMARK] nproc: Look Ma, No get_tgid_list! Roger Luethi
2004-08-31 19:38               ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040827133947.GA23844@k3.hellgate.ch \
    --to=rl@hellgate.ch \
    --cc=albert@users.sf.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox