From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267648AbUH0VC6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:02:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267739AbUH0VBy (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:01:54 -0400 Received: from nysv.org ([213.157.66.145]:34211 "EHLO nysv.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266756AbUH0UzN (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:55:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 23:53:32 +0300 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Horst von Brand , Hans Reiser , Andrew Morton , hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, flx@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Message-ID: <20040827205332.GD1284@nysv.org> References: <412D9FE6.9050307@namesys.com> <200408261812.i7QICW8r002679@localhost.localdomain> <20040827203216.GC1284@nysv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i From: mjt@nysv.org (Markus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=20T=F6rnqvist?=) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >Heh. Considering that WinFS seems to be delayed yet more, I don't think >that's a very strong argument. But there's Mac OS and isn't Solaris doing something along these lines? Microsoft isn't alone there ;) >scare people with MS activities. Linux kernel developers do what's right >because it is _right_, not because somebody else does it. Never really doubted that, mind you. I just think this is both right and a competition situation. -- mjt