Re: reverse engineering pwcx

Chris Meadors
2004-08-28T19:21:28Z

Vojtech Pavlik wrote:

> But 160x120 sounds pretty ridiculous. It still would be possible to
> scale that to 640x480 smoothly, but the image would be obviously blurry
> and just awful even with avanced Bayer-based scaling techniques.

That sounds about right. At 640x480 the QuickCam 3000 is an awful
blurry mess. Though I think the actual pixel count would be a multiple
(divisor) of CIF, because in the nCIF resolutions it seems to expose
more pixels.