From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267665AbUH1Tlu (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:41:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267666AbUH1Tlt (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:41:49 -0400 Received: from alias.nmd.msu.ru ([193.232.127.67]:24848 "EHLO alias.nmd.msu.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267665AbUH1Tll (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:41:41 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 23:41:40 +0400 From: Alexander Lyamin To: flx@msu.ru, Christophe Saout , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Hans Reiser , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, flx@namesys.com, torvalds@osdl.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins (was: silent semantic changes with reiser4) Message-ID: <20040828194140.GL6746@alias> Reply-To: flx@msu.ru Mail-Followup-To: flx@msu.ru, Christophe Saout , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Hans Reiser , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, flx@namesys.com, torvalds@osdl.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com References: <20040826014542.4bfe7cc3.akpm@osdl.org> <1093522729.9004.40.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <20040826124929.GA542@lst.de> <1093525234.9004.55.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <20040826130718.GB820@lst.de> <1093526273.11694.8.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <20040826132439.GA1188@lst.de> <1093527307.11694.23.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <20040828111807.GC6746@alias> <20040828161113.GA27278@delft.aura.cs.cmu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040828161113.GA27278@delft.aura.cs.cmu.edu> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.5-7.104-smp X-Fnord: +++ath X-WebTV-Stationery: Standard; BGColor=black; TextColor=black X-Message-Flag: Message text blocked: ADULT LANGUAGE/SITUATIONS User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 12:11:14PM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote: > On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 03:18:07PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote: > > It will get there, just consider it constructive criticism. If we can > help resolve or refute the technical issues, all the better. We might > even end up with improvements or extensions to the VFS or MM making life > easier for everyone. That would be nice. Some nice points too (metas/metas in just noice tough). -- "the liberation loophole will make it clear.." lex lyamin