From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@osdl.org
Subject: [1/5] move waitqueue functions to kernel/wait.c
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:06:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040828200659.GS5492@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040828200549.GR5492@holomorphy.com>
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 01:05:49PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> These patches have the further benefit and intention of enabling aio
> to use filtered wakeups by standardizing the data structure passed to
> wake functions so that embedded waitqueue elements in aio structures
> may be succesfully passed to the filtered wakeup wake functions, though
> this patch series doesn't implement that particular functionality.
> Successfully stress-tested on x86-64, and ia64 in recent prior versions.
Move waitqueue -related functions not needing static functions in
sched.c to kernel/wait.c
Index: wait-2.6.9-rc1-mm1/kernel/Makefile
===================================================================
--- wait-2.6.9-rc1-mm1.orig/kernel/Makefile 2004-08-28 09:43:20.428470784 -0700
+++ wait-2.6.9-rc1-mm1/kernel/Makefile 2004-08-28 09:45:17.915610024 -0700
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
sysctl.o capability.o ptrace.o timer.o user.o \
signal.o sys.o kmod.o workqueue.o pid.o \
rcupdate.o intermodule.o extable.o params.o posix-timers.o \
- kthread.o
+ kthread.o wait.o
obj-$(CONFIG_FUTEX) += futex.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
Index: wait-2.6.9-rc1-mm1/kernel/wait.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ wait-2.6.9-rc1-mm1/kernel/wait.c 2004-08-28 09:46:45.808248312 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+/*
+ * Generic waiting primitives.
+ *
+ * (C) 2004 William Irwin, Oracle
+ */
+#include <linux/config.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
+
+void fastcall add_wait_queue(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ wait->flags &= ~WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
+ __add_wait_queue(q, wait);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_wait_queue);
+
+void fastcall add_wait_queue_exclusive(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ wait->flags |= WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
+ __add_wait_queue_tail(q, wait);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_wait_queue_exclusive);
+
+void fastcall remove_wait_queue(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
+ __remove_wait_queue(q, wait);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(remove_wait_queue);
+
+
+/*
+ * Note: we use "set_current_state()" _after_ the wait-queue add,
+ * because we need a memory barrier there on SMP, so that any
+ * wake-function that tests for the wait-queue being active
+ * will be guaranteed to see waitqueue addition _or_ subsequent
+ * tests in this thread will see the wakeup having taken place.
+ *
+ * The spin_unlock() itself is semi-permeable and only protects
+ * one way (it only protects stuff inside the critical region and
+ * stops them from bleeding out - it would still allow subsequent
+ * loads to move into the the critical region).
+ */
+void fastcall
+prepare_to_wait(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait, int state)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ wait->flags &= ~WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
+ if (list_empty(&wait->task_list))
+ __add_wait_queue(q, wait);
+ /*
+ * don't alter the task state if this is just going to
+ * queue an async wait queue callback
+ */
+ if (is_sync_wait(wait))
+ set_current_state(state);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(prepare_to_wait);
+
+void fastcall
+prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait, int state)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ wait->flags |= WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
+ if (list_empty(&wait->task_list))
+ __add_wait_queue_tail(q, wait);
+ /*
+ * don't alter the task state if this is just going to
+ * queue an async wait queue callback
+ */
+ if (is_sync_wait(wait))
+ set_current_state(state);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(prepare_to_wait_exclusive);
+
+void fastcall finish_wait(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ /*
+ * We can check for list emptiness outside the lock
+ * IFF:
+ * - we use the "careful" check that verifies both
+ * the next and prev pointers, so that there cannot
+ * be any half-pending updates in progress on other
+ * CPU's that we haven't seen yet (and that might
+ * still change the stack area.
+ * and
+ * - all other users take the lock (ie we can only
+ * have _one_ other CPU that looks at or modifies
+ * the list).
+ */
+ if (!list_empty_careful(&wait->task_list)) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
+ list_del_init(&wait->task_list);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(finish_wait);
+
+int autoremove_wake_function(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
+{
+ int ret = default_wake_function(wait, mode, sync, key);
+
+ if (ret)
+ list_del_init(&wait->task_list);
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(autoremove_wake_function);
Index: wait-2.6.9-rc1-mm1/kernel/fork.c
===================================================================
--- wait-2.6.9-rc1-mm1.orig/kernel/fork.c 2004-08-28 09:43:34.177380632 -0700
+++ wait-2.6.9-rc1-mm1/kernel/fork.c 2004-08-28 09:45:17.925608504 -0700
@@ -102,131 +102,6 @@
free_task(tsk);
}
-void fastcall add_wait_queue(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t * wait)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
-
- wait->flags &= ~WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
- __add_wait_queue(q, wait);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_wait_queue);
-
-void fastcall add_wait_queue_exclusive(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t * wait)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
-
- wait->flags |= WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
- __add_wait_queue_tail(q, wait);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_wait_queue_exclusive);
-
-void fastcall remove_wait_queue(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t * wait)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
- __remove_wait_queue(q, wait);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(remove_wait_queue);
-
-
-/*
- * Note: we use "set_current_state()" _after_ the wait-queue add,
- * because we need a memory barrier there on SMP, so that any
- * wake-function that tests for the wait-queue being active
- * will be guaranteed to see waitqueue addition _or_ subsequent
- * tests in this thread will see the wakeup having taken place.
- *
- * The spin_unlock() itself is semi-permeable and only protects
- * one way (it only protects stuff inside the critical region and
- * stops them from bleeding out - it would still allow subsequent
- * loads to move into the the critical region).
- */
-void fastcall prepare_to_wait(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait, int state)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
-
- wait->flags &= ~WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
- if (list_empty(&wait->task_list))
- __add_wait_queue(q, wait);
- /*
- * don't alter the task state if this is just going to
- * queue an async wait queue callback
- */
- if (is_sync_wait(wait))
- set_current_state(state);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(prepare_to_wait);
-
-void fastcall
-prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait, int state)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
-
- wait->flags |= WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
- if (list_empty(&wait->task_list))
- __add_wait_queue_tail(q, wait);
- /*
- * don't alter the task state if this is just going to
- * queue an async wait queue callback
- */
- if (is_sync_wait(wait))
- set_current_state(state);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(prepare_to_wait_exclusive);
-
-void fastcall finish_wait(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
-
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- /*
- * We can check for list emptiness outside the lock
- * IFF:
- * - we use the "careful" check that verifies both
- * the next and prev pointers, so that there cannot
- * be any half-pending updates in progress on other
- * CPU's that we haven't seen yet (and that might
- * still change the stack area.
- * and
- * - all other users take the lock (ie we can only
- * have _one_ other CPU that looks at or modifies
- * the list).
- */
- if (!list_empty_careful(&wait->task_list)) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
- list_del_init(&wait->task_list);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
- }
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(finish_wait);
-
-int autoremove_wake_function(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
-{
- int ret = default_wake_function(wait, mode, sync, key);
-
- if (ret)
- list_del_init(&wait->task_list);
- return ret;
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(autoremove_wake_function);
-
void __init fork_init(unsigned long mempages)
{
#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_TASK_STRUCT_ALLOCATOR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-28 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-28 20:05 [0/5] standardized waitqueue hashing William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 20:06 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-08-28 20:08 ` [2/5] consolidate bit waiting code patterns William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 20:09 ` [3/5] " William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 20:11 ` [4/5] eliminate bh waitqueue hashtable William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 20:12 ` [5/5] eliminate inode " William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 22:37 ` [4/5] eliminate bh " Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 23:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 20:21 ` [2/5] consolidate bit waiting code patterns William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-28 22:33 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040828200659.GS5492@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox