From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: rl@hellgate.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
albert@users.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] nproc: netlink access to /proc information
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:07:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040829120733.455f0c82.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040829172022.GL5492@holomorphy.com>
> get_tgid_list() is a sad story I don't have time to go into in depth.
> The short version is that larger systems are extremely sensitive to
Thanks, Roger and William, for your good work here. I'm sure that SGI's
big bertha's will benefit.
In glancing at the get_tgid_list() I see it is careful to only pick off
20 (PROC_MAXPIDS) slots at a time. But elsewhere in the kernel, I see
several uses of "do_each_thread()" which rip through the entire task
list in a single shot.
Is there a simple explanation for why it is ok in one place to take on
the entire task list in a single sweep, but in another it is important
to drop the lock every 20 slots?
>From the code and nice comments, I see that:
(1) the work that had to be done by proc_pid_readdir(), the caller of
get_tgid_list(), required dropping the task list lock, and
(2) so the harvested tgid's had to be stashed in a temp buffer.
So perhaps the reason for not doing this in a single pass is:
(3) it was not doable or not desirable (which one?) to size that temp
buffer large enough to hold all the harvested tgid's in one pass.
But my understanding is losing the scent of the trail at this point.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-29 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-27 12:24 [0/2][ANNOUNCE] nproc: netlink access to /proc information Roger Luethi
2004-08-27 12:24 ` [1/2][PATCH] " Roger Luethi
2004-08-27 13:39 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-27 12:24 ` [2/2][sample code] nproc: user space app Roger Luethi
2004-08-27 14:50 ` [0/2][ANNOUNCE] nproc: netlink access to /proc information James Morris
2004-08-27 15:26 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-27 16:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-27 16:37 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-27 16:41 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-27 17:01 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-27 17:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 19:45 ` [BENCHMARK] " Roger Luethi
2004-08-28 19:56 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-28 20:14 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-29 16:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 17:02 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-29 17:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 17:52 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-29 18:16 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 19:00 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-29 20:17 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-29 20:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 21:45 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-29 22:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 21:41 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-29 23:31 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-30 7:16 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-30 10:31 ` Paulo Marques
2004-08-30 10:53 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-30 12:23 ` Paulo Marques
2004-08-30 12:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-30 13:43 ` Paulo Marques
2004-08-29 19:07 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2004-08-29 19:17 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 19:49 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-29 20:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-31 10:16 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-31 15:34 ` [BENCHMARK] nproc: Look Ma, No get_tgid_list! Roger Luethi
2004-08-31 19:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040829120733.455f0c82.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rl@hellgate.ch \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox