From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SMP Panic caused by [PATCH] sched: consolidate sched domains
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 10:22:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040829172250.GM5492@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1093799390.10990.19.camel@mulgrave>
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 13:03, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> -#define node_to_cpumask(node) (cpu_online_map)
>> +#define node_to_cpumask(node) (cpu_possible_map)
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 01:09:49PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> I really don't think so. This macro is also used at runtime, so there
> it would return CPUs that aren't online.
> It does look like all runtime uses in sched.c pass node_to_cpumask
> through any_online_cpu(), so at least for the scheduler, the change may
> be safe, but you'd have to audit all other runtime uses.
./drivers/base/node.c:22: cpumask_t mask = node_to_cpumask(node_dev->sysdev.id);
./arch/ia64/sn/io/sn2/ml_SN_intr.c:63: cpu = first_cpu(node_to_cpumask(cnode));
./arch/ia64/sn/io/sn2/ml_SN_intr.c:69: cpu = first_cpu(node_to_cpumask(node));
./arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c:30:cpumask_t node_to_cpumask[MAXNODE];
./arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c:163: set_bit(0, &node_to_cpumask[cpu_to_node(0)]);
./arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c:234: node_to_cpumask[0] = cpumask_of_cpu(0);
./arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c:242: set_bit(cpu, &node_to_cpumask[cpu_to_node(cpu)]);
./arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c:277:EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_to_cpumask);
./arch/x86_64/pci/k8-bus.c:57: node_to_cpumask(NODE_ID(nid));
./include/asm-ppc64/topology.h:24:static inline cpumask_t node_to_cpumask(int node)
./include/asm-ppc64/topology.h:32: tmp = node_to_cpumask(node);
./include/asm-x86_64/topology.h:16:extern cpumask_t node_to_cpumask[];
./include/asm-x86_64/topology.h:21:#define node_to_first_cpu(node) (__ffs(node_to_cpumask[node]))
./include/asm-x86_64/topology.h:22:#define node_to_cpumask(node) (node_to_cpumask[node])
./include/asm-generic/topology.h:38:#ifndef node_to_cpumask
./include/asm-generic/topology.h:39:#define node_to_cpumask(node) (cpu_possible_map)
./include/asm-mips/mach-ip27/topology.h:8:#define node_to_cpumask(node) (HUB_DATA(node)->h_cpus)
./include/asm-mips/mach-ip27/topology.h:9:#define node_to_first_cpu(node) (first_cpu(node_to_cpumask(node)))
./include/asm-ia64/topology.h:29:#define node_to_cpumask(node) (node_to_cpu_mask[node])
./include/asm-ia64/topology.h:41:#define node_to_first_cpu(node) (__ffs(node_to_cpumask(node)))
./include/linux/topology.h:41: __tmp__ = node_to_cpumask(node); \
./include/asm-alpha/topology.h:25:static inline cpumask_t node_to_cpumask(int node)
./include/asm-i386/topology.h:51:static inline cpumask_t node_to_cpumask(int node)
./include/asm-i386/topology.h:59: cpumask_t mask = node_to_cpumask(node);
./include/asm-i386/topology.h:66: return node_to_cpumask(mp_bus_id_to_node[bus]);
./kernel/sched.c:3810: mask = node_to_cpumask(node);
./kernel/sched.c:4059: nodemask = node_to_cpumask(next_node);
./kernel/sched.c:4187: cpumask_t nodemask = node_to_cpumask(cpu_to_node(i));
./kernel/sched.c:4267: cpumask_t nodemask = node_to_cpumask(i);
./mm/page_alloc.c:1324: tmp = node_to_cpumask(n);
./mm/vmscan.c:1127: cpumask = node_to_cpumask(pgdat->node_id);
./mm/vmscan.c:1214: mask = node_to_cpumask(pgdat->node_id);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-29 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-29 13:39 SMP Panic caused by [PATCH] sched: consolidate sched domains James Bottomley
2004-08-29 16:48 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-29 16:58 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-29 17:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-29 17:16 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-30 19:11 ` Matthew Dobson
2004-08-29 17:24 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-29 17:48 ` Nathan Lynch
2004-08-29 22:59 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-29 17:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 17:09 ` James Bottomley
2004-08-29 17:22 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-08-29 17:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 17:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 17:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-29 23:13 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040829172250.GM5492@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox