From: Brian Litzinger <brian@worldcontrol.com>
To: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
Cc: Kenneth Lavrsen <kenneth@lavrsen.dk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
pmarques@grupopie.com, greg@kroah.com, nemosoft@smcc.demon.nl,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: pwc+pwcx is not illegal
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:41:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040830174137.GB24392@top.worldcontrol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408272124300.2441@fogarty.jakma.org>
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 09:26:26PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Kenneth Lavrsen wrote:
>
> >magazines and news papers. I just cannot accept that people can
> >care so little for other people.
>
> These people do care, they created, wrote and/or maintain the Linux
> kernel in the first place! They also are wise enough to care more the
> long-term interests of Linux than just the short-term.
So we have to step on a few people on the way to build our great
an glorious utopia! Well at leat it is for their own good.
--
Brian Litzinger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-30 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-27 19:18 pwc+pwcx is not illegal Albert Cahalan
2004-08-27 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-27 20:06 ` Kenneth Lavrsen
2004-08-27 20:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-27 20:24 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-27 20:26 ` Paul Jakma
2004-08-30 17:41 ` Brian Litzinger [this message]
2004-08-27 20:38 ` David Ford
2004-08-27 20:57 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-27 21:04 ` Greg KH
2004-08-27 21:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-29 14:00 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-29 16:33 ` Nemosoft Unv.
2004-08-29 15:42 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-29 17:17 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Randy.Dunlap
2004-08-29 17:16 ` Norbert van Nobelen
2004-08-27 19:34 ` Paulo Marques
2004-08-27 21:34 ` Albert Cahalan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-28 8:15 Gabucino
2004-08-28 10:30 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-08-28 12:18 Kenneth Lavrsen
2004-08-28 13:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-28 15:24 ` Kenneth Lavrsen
2004-08-29 14:02 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-01 22:51 ` Rogier Wolff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040830174137.GB24392@top.worldcontrol.com \
--to=brian@worldcontrol.com \
--cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kenneth@lavrsen.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=nemosoft@smcc.demon.nl \
--cc=paul@clubi.ie \
--cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox