From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263117AbUIAAYK (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:24:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269209AbUIAAJg (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:09:36 -0400 Received: from frog.mt.lv ([159.148.172.197]:24740 "EHLO frog.mt.lv") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269218AbUHaXo4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:44:56 -0400 From: Dmitry Golubev To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [PATCH] embedding 2.6 or more findings on kernel size Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 02:41:20 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200408302307.35052.dmitry@mikrotik.com> <200408311710.01601.dmitry@mikrotik.com> <20040831202707.GQ3466@fs.tum.de> In-Reply-To: <20040831202707.GQ3466@fs.tum.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409010241.20950.dmitry@mikrotik.com> X-mikrotik.com-Virus_kerajs: Not scanned. X-mikrotik.com-Virus_un_spam-kerajs: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Please don't include this. what a good start... > I'd prefer to switch i386 cpu selection to a different scheme which > gives you effectively these options for free without additional options. I admit, I might have missed the latest version of your patch, but in what I have seen, some functionality have been missing comparing to my patch (do you have a possibility to compile a kernel especially for NexGen, Transmeta or UMC?), and it also changes user experience, which obviously should not happen in the stable branch. However, it might be a good idea to work on your patch for v 2.7. Anyway, if you would like, I can separate CPU support part of the patch from the other parts... Dmitry