From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Andre Eisenbach <int2str@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm2
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 00:25:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040901072525.GX5492@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7f800d9f040901001551f92762@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 12:15:50AM -0700, Andre Eisenbach wrote:
> Does not compile for me:
> CC kernel/wait.o
> kernel/wait.c:156: error: conflicting types for '__wait_on_bit'
> include/linux/wait.h:143: error: previous declaration of
> '__wait_on_bit' was here
[...]
> Let me know if you need the .config or any other info.
> Thanks for your continued hard work guys!
Please apply the following fixes:
Index: mm2-2.6.9-rc1/include/linux/wait.h
===================================================================
--- mm2-2.6.9-rc1.orig/include/linux/wait.h 2004-08-31 16:01:44.000000000 -0700
+++ mm2-2.6.9-rc1/include/linux/wait.h 2004-08-31 16:02:00.000000000 -0700
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@
DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(q, word, bit);
wait_queue_head_t *wqh;
- if (!test_bit(bit, word))
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(bit, word))
return 0;
wqh = bit_waitqueue(word, bit);
Index: mm2-2.6.9-rc1/kernel/wait.c
===================================================================
--- mm2-2.6.9-rc1.orig/kernel/wait.c 2004-08-31 16:01:44.000000000 -0700
+++ mm2-2.6.9-rc1/kernel/wait.c 2004-08-31 16:02:00.000000000 -0700
@@ -150,8 +150,8 @@
* waiting, the actions of __wait_on_bit() and __wait_on_bit_lock() are
* permitted return codes. Nonzero return codes halt waiting and return.
*/
-int __sched __wait_on_bit(wait_queue_head_t *wq, struct wait_bit_queue *q,
- void *word,
+int __sched fastcall __wait_on_bit(wait_queue_head_t *wq,
+ struct wait_bit_queue *q, void *word,
int bit, int (*action)(void *), unsigned mode)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -164,8 +164,8 @@
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__wait_on_bit);
-int __sched __wait_on_bit_lock(wait_queue_head_t *wq, struct wait_bit_queue *q,
- void *word, int bit,
+int __sched fastcall __wait_on_bit_lock(wait_queue_head_t *wq,
+ struct wait_bit_queue *q, void *word, int bit,
int (*action)(void *), unsigned mode)
{
int ret = 0;
More recent patches modify files in wait-on-bit-lock-fix.patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-01 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-31 6:54 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Andrew Morton
2004-08-31 8:51 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Inconsistent kallsyms Helge Hafting
2004-08-31 9:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-01 10:45 ` Helge Hafting
2004-08-31 11:05 ` Paulo Marques
2004-08-31 12:04 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2: tdfxfb_lib causes compile error Adrian Bunk
2004-08-31 17:21 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 (compile stats) John Cherry
2004-08-31 17:41 ` [patch] 2.6.9-rc1-mm2: char/pcxx.c doesn't compile Adrian Bunk
2004-08-31 20:18 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-08-31 20:17 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-31 20:27 ` Jesper Juhl
2004-08-31 17:47 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2: why is DIGIEPCA marked BROKEN? Adrian Bunk
2004-08-31 19:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-08-31 19:59 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-08-31 18:53 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-31 19:16 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Gene Heskett
2004-08-31 19:45 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-31 19:26 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Andrew Morton
2004-08-31 18:54 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Gene Heskett
2004-08-31 19:41 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Sam Ravnborg
2004-09-01 17:35 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Tom Rini
2004-09-01 19:23 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Sam Ravnborg
2004-08-31 22:13 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Rick Lindsley
2004-09-01 21:07 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2: IP_NF_COMPAT_IPCHAINS compilation broken Adrian Bunk
2004-09-01 7:15 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Andre Eisenbach
2004-09-01 7:25 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-09-01 9:15 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Andre Eisenbach
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-31 17:01 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Bill Davidsen
2004-08-31 19:42 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 William Lee Irwin III
[not found] <2zaWg-4Yj-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2zxzF-4pS-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2zxJk-4vm-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-03 9:50 ` 2.6.9-rc1-mm2 Martin Wilck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040901072525.GX5492@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=int2str@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox