public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Kirill Korotaev <kksx@mail.ru>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] obscure pid implementation fix (v2)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 08:36:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040901153624.GA5492@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1C2TZ1-000JZr-00.kksx-mail-ru@f7.mail.ru>

On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 03:46:07PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> I remade the previous patch against the latest Linus tree, please apply.
> This patch fixes strange and obscure pid implementation in current kernels:
> - it removes calling of put_task_struct() from detach_pid()
>   under tasklist_lock. This allows to use blocking calls
>   in security_task_free() hooks (in __put_task_struct()).
> - it saves some space = 5*5 ints = 100 bytes in task_struct
> - it's smaller and tidy, more straigthforward and doesn't use
>   any knowledge about pids using and assignment.
> - it removes pid_links and pid_struct doesn't hold reference counters
>   on task_struct. instead, new pid_structs and linked altogether and
>   only one of them is inserted in hash_list.
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Korotaev (kksx@mail.ru)

Could you not rename struct pid and not rename for_each_task_pid()?

Thanks.


-- wli

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-01 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-01 11:46 [PATCH] obscure pid implementation fix (v2) Kirill Korotaev
2004-09-01 15:36 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-09-01 15:38   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-01 16:58   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-01 17:27     ` [1/7] make do_each_task_pid()/while_each_task_pid() typecheck William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-01 17:28       ` [2/7] make do_each_task_pid()/while_each_task_pid() require a semicolon following them William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-01 17:30         ` [3/7] make do_each_task_pid()/while_each_task_pid() parenthesize their arguments William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-01 17:32           ` [4/7] fix loop termination condition in do_each_task_pid()/while_each_task_pid() William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-01 17:33             ` [5/7] back out renaming of struct pid William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-01 17:35               ` [6/7] back out renaming of ->pid_chain William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-01 17:37                 ` [7/7] remove casting of __detach_pid() results to void William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-01 17:48       ` [1/7] make do_each_task_pid()/while_each_task_pid() typecheck Linus Torvalds
2004-09-01 17:59         ` [1/1] rework of Kirill Korotaev's pidhashing patch William Lee Irwin III
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-01 11:43 [PATCH] obscure pid implementation fix (v2) Kirill Korotaev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040901153624.GA5492@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=kksx@mail.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox