public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netpoll trapped question
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 16:35:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040906213502.GU31237@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16692.45331.968648.262910@segfault.boston.redhat.com>

On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:10:43PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Hi, Matt,
> 
> This part of the netpoll trapped logic seems suspect to me, from
> include/linux/netdevice.h:
> 
> static inline void netif_wake_queue(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP
> 	if (netpoll_trap())
> 		return;
> #endif
> 	if (test_and_clear_bit(__LINK_STATE_XOFF, &dev->state))
> 		__netif_schedule(dev);
> }
> 
> static inline void netif_stop_queue(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP
> 	if (netpoll_trap())
> 		return;
> #endif
> 	set_bit(__LINK_STATE_XOFF, &dev->state);
> }
> 
> This looks buggy.  Network drivers are now not able to stop the queue when
> they run out of Tx descriptors.  I think the __netif_schedule is okay to do
> in the context of netpoll, and certainly a set_bit is okay.  Why are these
> hooks in place?  I've tested alt-sysrq-t over netconsole and also netdump
> with these #ifdef's removed, and things work correctly.  Compare this with
> alt-sysrq-t hanging the system with these tests in place.  If I run netdump
> with this logic still in place, I get the following messages from the tg3
> driver:
> 
>   eth0: BUG! Tx Ring full when queue awake!
> 
> Shall I send a patch, or have I missed something?

I don't remember the origin or motivation of this bit, so I'm not sure
at the moment. Shoot me a patch and I'll poke at it.

Btw, did I send you my thoughts on your recursion patch?

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-06 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-31 17:10 netpoll trapped question Jeff Moyer
2004-09-06 21:35 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2004-09-07 16:33   ` Jeff Moyer
2004-09-07 16:50     ` Matt Mackall
2004-09-07 16:53       ` Jeff Moyer
2004-09-07 16:59         ` Matt Mackall
2004-09-07 17:10           ` Jeff Moyer
2004-09-07 17:22             ` Matt Mackall
2004-09-08  8:22             ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-08  8:34               ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-08 11:54                 ` Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040906213502.GU31237@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox