From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Scott Wood <scott@timesys.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] generic-hardirqs.patch, 2.6.9-rc1-bk14
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 06:09:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040908130908.GE3106@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040908140146.A31601@infradead.org>
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 05:57:55AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> It may be time for a __weak define to abbreviate __attribute__((weak));
>> we seem to use it in enough places.
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 02:01:46PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Personally I'm extremly unhappy with that week model for things like
> this. There's no reason why architectures could implement irq handling
> as inlines. Or in case of s390 not at all.
If there's a question of "not at all" that probably rules out weak
symbols as a method of handling it.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-08 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-08 12:06 [patch] generic-hardirqs.patch, 2.6.9-rc1-bk14 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-08 12:29 ` La Monte H.P. Yarroll
2004-09-08 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-08 13:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-08 13:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-08 12:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-08 12:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-08 12:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-08 13:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-08 13:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-08 13:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-08 13:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-08 13:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-09 17:56 ` Scott Wood
2004-09-08 12:57 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-08 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-08 13:09 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-09-08 13:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-08 13:34 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-08 13:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-08 13:47 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-08 14:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-08 18:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-08 18:42 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-08 21:14 ` [patch] generic-hardirqs-2.6.9-rc1-mm4.patch Ingo Molnar
2004-09-09 16:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-09 17:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-09 17:53 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-09 17:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-09 17:56 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-09 20:10 ` Russell King
2004-09-09 20:51 ` Scott Wood
2004-09-09 21:00 ` Russell King
2004-09-10 5:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-09 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-09-09 20:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-09 20:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-08 13:03 ` [patch] generic-hardirqs.patch, 2.6.9-rc1-bk14 Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040908130908.GE3106@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=scott@timesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox