public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@parallab.uib.no>
To: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Major XFS problems...
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 18:16:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040908161652.GA4353@ii.uib.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040908123524.GZ390@unthought.net>

On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 02:35:24PM +0200, Jakob Oestergaard wrote:
> 
> First XFS bug:
> ---------------
> http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=309

I've shared your frustration this summer:

	http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2840
	http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2841
	http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2929
	http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3118


but after 2.6.8.1 and going back to 8K stacks, my fileserver has been
stable.

> XFS causes lowmem oom, triggering the OOM killer. Reported by
> as@cohaesio.com on the 18th of august.

Have you tried if this helps:

	sysctl -w vm.vfs_cache_pressure=10000

Fixed oom-killer problems for me on 2.6.8-rc2. It was very eager to
kill the backup (tivoli storage manager) client.  Haven't needed it so
far on 2.6.8.1. 

> A little info on the hardware:
>  Big server             Small server
> ---------------------- -----------------------
> Intel Xeon              Dual Athlon MP
> 7 external SCSI disks   4 internal IDE disks
> IBM hardware RAID       Software RAID-1 + LVM
> 600+ GB XFS             ~150 GB XFS
> 17+ M files             ~1 M files


Dual pentium-III (IBM x330)
2 TB Infortren Eonstore, fibre channel
500 GB in use
~5 M files


Also have another dual Xeon (Dell PowerEdge 2650) with ~1 TB on XFS,
but that's running 2.4.20-30.8.XFS1.3.1smp, and has never had any
problems. 

> 
> Does anyone actually use XFS for serious file-serving?  

Yes,

> 
> If XFS is a no-go because of lack of support, is there any realistic
> alternatives under Linux (taking our need for quota into account) ?
> 
> And finally, if Linux is simply a no-go for high performance file
> serving, what other suggestions might people have?  NetApp?

My impression so far has been more that the 2.6-series might not yet
have been stable enough. Have had to be chasing the leading/bleeding
edge to get away from the known problems.  Was looking forward to a
real "maintainer" taking over this series, but that doesn't seem to be
happening.. 


  -jf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-09-08 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-08 12:35 Major XFS problems Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-08 15:04 ` Anando Bhattacharya
2004-09-08 15:44   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-08 16:36     ` Greg Banks
2004-09-08 17:30       ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-09  2:42         ` Greg Banks
2004-09-08 19:06       ` Bill Davidsen
2004-09-09  3:23         ` Greg Banks
2004-09-09 14:00       ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-10  2:40         ` Greg Banks
2004-09-10  3:04           ` Kyle Moffett
2004-09-10  3:24             ` Greg Banks
2004-09-13  7:29         ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-17 11:26           ` [PATCH] " Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-29 21:45             ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-29 22:16               ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-08 16:16 ` Jan-Frode Myklebust [this message]
2004-09-08 21:40 ` Nathan Scott
2004-09-08 23:22   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-08 23:42     ` Nathan Scott
2004-09-09 12:11       ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-09 18:09         ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-09-11 11:39 ` Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
2004-09-11 13:03   ` Bjoern Brauel
2004-09-11 13:38   ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-11 14:54     ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-09-11 18:20     ` Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
2004-09-11 13:58 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-08 13:07 Piszcz, Justin Michael
2004-09-08 13:26 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-08 15:24 Piszcz, Justin Michael
     [not found] <20040908133954.GB390@unthought.net>
     [not found] ` <20040909074533.B3958243@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
     [not found]   ` <413F823F.3020507@xfs.org>
2004-09-09  6:52     ` Dave Chinner
2004-09-09  8:10       ` Andrew Morton
     [not found] <2Ca3I-2kY-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <2Cdl9-4Pc-65@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-11  9:21   ` ADH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040908161652.GA4353@ii.uib.no \
    --to=janfrode@parallab.uib.no \
    --cc=jakob@unthought.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox