From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269211AbUIHX6j (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2004 19:58:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269204AbUIHX5F (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2004 19:57:05 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:5337 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269209AbUIHXyi (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Sep 2004 19:54:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:50:10 -0700 From: Greg KH To: David Brownell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc1-bk+] update Documentation/power/pci.txt Message-ID: <20040908235010.GA8361@kroah.com> References: <200409081046.24302.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409081046.24302.david-b@pacbell.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:46:24AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > That document was wrong on some things, misleading on others; this > fixes some of the issues I noticed. > > However it probably needs to say that drivers for devices that implement > the PCI PM spec "should" always use pci_set_power_state() to reduce the > power usage. If I get ambitions I might submit a patch to the PCI core > to print a nag message for drivers that don't do that. Applied, thanks. greg k-h