public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: why is sk->skb->sk_socket->file  NULL on incoming packets?
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:20:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040909182053.P1973@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040910004517.GC7587@lkcl.net>; from lkcl@lkcl.net on Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 01:45:17AM +0100

* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (lkcl@lkcl.net) wrote:
> hi, simple question - if a userspace ip_queue program (fireflier)
> can determine the pid of an incoming packet, why can't ipt_owner.c
> do the same?
> 
> how do i force, even by using a userspace thing which asks the
> packet to be "re-examined", the skb->sk->sk_socket->file to be
> set?

I assume the netfilter hook you come in on is NF_IP_LOCAL_IN?  This is
at ip level.  The sock (sk) is protocol specific, and hasn't been
looked up yet.  Look at the protocols' input handlers (i.e. udp_rcv or
tcp_v4_rcv), they do this lookup (i.e. udp_v4_lookup or __tcp_v4_lookup).
The sk_filter() point is probably the first time you have an association
between the skb (inbound) and the sock it's going to be queued to.
LSM modules use security_sock_rcv_skb at this point.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-10  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-10  0:45 why is sk->skb->sk_socket->file NULL on incoming packets? Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-10  1:20 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2004-09-10  1:36   ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040909182053.P1973@build.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkcl@lkcl.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox