From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266574AbUIJB5l (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 21:57:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266880AbUIJB5l (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 21:57:41 -0400 Received: from serwer.tvgawex.pl ([212.122.214.2]:19990 "HELO mother.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S266574AbUIJB53 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Sep 2004 21:57:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 03:57:15 +0200 From: Tomasz Torcz To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: patches failing - is 2.6.9-rc1 patch against 2.6.8? (not 2.6.8.1) Message-ID: <20040910015715.GC31473@irc.pl> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040909214208.3b259016@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20040909214208.3b259016@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 09:42:08PM -0400, Johann Koenig wrote: > I get the following when trying to get the 2.6.9-rc1 kernel: > > jkoenig@note:/usr/src$ grep -i fail patch.rc1.info -A5 -B5 > patching file Makefile > Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. > 1 out of 13 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej > patching file fs/nfs/file.c > Hunk #2 FAILED at 74. > Hunk #3 FAILED at 91. > 2 out of 11 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/nfs/file.c.rej You are probably patching 2.6.8.1. That's wrong way. 2.6.9-rc1.patch is made against 2.6.8. -- Tomasz Torcz To co nierealne - tutaj jest normalne. zdzichu@irc.-nie.spam-.pl Ziomale na życie mają tu patenty specjalne.