From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@fsmlabs.com>,
torvalds@osdl.org, paulus@samba.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jun.nakajima@intel.com, ak@suse.de,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Yielding processor resources during lock contention
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 15:10:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040912051054.GI32755@krispykreme> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040911220003.0e9061ad.akpm@osdl.org>
> Now, maybe Paul has tied himself into sufficiently tangly locking knots
> that in some circumstances he needs to spin on the lock and cannot schedule
> away. But he can still use a semaphore and spin on down_trylock.
>
> Confused by all of this.
On a shared processor machine you might have a 4 way box with a number
of 4 way partitions on it. Having them sized as 4 way partitions allows
them to utilise the entire machine when the others are idle.
Now when all partitions start getting busy you have the problem where
one partition may be spinning waiting for a lock but the cpu with the
lock is not currently being scheduled by the hypervisor. Some other
partition is running over there.
At the moment we spin burning cycles until the other cpu finally gets
scheduled by the hypervisor. A slightly better option is for the busy
spinning cpu to call the hypervisor telling it youve got no useful work
to do.
The best option is to call the hypervisor and tell it that you are are
busy spinning waiting for that other cpu to be scheduled. The hypervisor
then takes whatever action it sees fit (transferring the current cpus
timeslice to the other cpu etc).
Anton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-12 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-03 0:02 [PATCH][5/8] Arch agnostic completely out of line locks / ppc64 Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-09 5:42 ` Paul Mackerras
2004-09-09 12:41 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-09 14:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-09 14:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-09 15:32 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12 4:59 ` [PATCH] Yielding processor resources during lock contention Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12 5:00 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-12 5:10 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2004-09-12 5:13 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12 4:32 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-12 5:33 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12 4:46 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-12 5:51 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12 5:02 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-12 6:09 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-12 6:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-12 5:18 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-12 5:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-12 5:27 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-13 12:21 ` [PATCH] Yielding processor resources during lock contention #2 Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12 7:49 ` [PATCH] Yielding processor resources during lock contention Ingo Molnar
2004-09-12 16:10 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12 19:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-12 10:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-09-12 10:43 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-12 11:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-09-09 15:43 ` [PATCH][5/8] Arch agnostic completely out of line locks / ppc64 Anton Blanchard
2004-09-09 17:19 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-09 21:38 ` Paul Mackerras
2004-09-09 22:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-09 23:36 ` Paul Mackerras
2004-09-10 0:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-10 0:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-10 0:35 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-10 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-10 1:42 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-10 1:50 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-10 2:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-10 2:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-10 2:37 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-10 3:24 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-10 7:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-10 12:16 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-10 12:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-10 3:23 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-10 7:56 ` Anton Blanchard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-13 0:45 [PATCH] Yielding processor resources during lock contention Nakajima, Jun
2004-09-13 1:35 Nakajima, Jun
2004-09-13 6:35 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040912051054.GI32755@krispykreme \
--to=anton@samba.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=zwane@fsmlabs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox