From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@novell.com>
To: Constantine Gavrilov <constg@qlusters.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
bugs@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Calling syscalls from x86-64 kernel results in a crash on Opteron machines
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:17:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040913161735.GC4180@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4145B750.6060900@qlusters.com>
Hi Constantine,
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 06:05:52PM +0300, Constantine Gavrilov wrote:
> And BTW, kernel-space applications have their own place even if the
> concept seems foreign to you.
I avoided to do like i386 that inefficiently calls int 0x80 when you can
call sys_read/sys_write etc.. by hand.
the syscall is only meaningful if you're not in kernel space. Once
you're in kernel space if you ever try to invoke a syscall again (either
via int 0x80, syscall, sysenter, call gate, whatever) then you're just
going slower than you should for no good reason.
The only point of calling int 0x80 and friends is to change mode from
user space to kernel space, and you're in kernel space already so you
should just call sys_read/sys_write etc.. by hand which will not waste
precious cycles and it'll be a lot simpler too.
Note also that int 0x80 will bring you into the 32bit emulation layer,
the only 64bit entry point is reacheable only via syscall.
Hope this helps.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-13 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-13 14:04 Calling syscalls from x86-64 kernel results in a crash on Opteron machines Constantine Gavrilov
2004-09-13 14:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-13 15:05 ` Constantine Gavrilov
2004-09-13 16:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2004-09-13 16:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-09-13 20:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-09-13 16:42 ` Greg KH
2004-09-13 17:21 ` Brian Gerst
2004-09-14 2:04 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-13 14:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-09-13 15:18 ` Constantine Gavrilov
2004-09-13 19:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-09-13 15:00 ` Brian Gerst
2004-09-13 15:26 ` Constantine Gavrilov
[not found] <2DZQy-7TB-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-13 14:31 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-13 15:28 ` Constantine Gavrilov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040913161735.GC4180@dualathlon.random \
--to=andrea@novell.com \
--cc=bugs@x86-64.org \
--cc=constg@qlusters.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox