From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>
Cc: linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
wli@holomorphy.com, cw@f00f.org, anton@samba.org
Subject: Re: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:32:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040914153214.GA15558@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1095083649.1174.1293.camel@cube>
* Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net> wrote:
> > > I'd much prefer LRU allocation. There are
> > > lots of system calls that take PID values.
> > > All such calls are hazardous. They're pretty
> > > much broken by design.
> >
> > this is a pretty sweeping assertion. Would you
> > care to mention a few examples of such hazards?
>
> kill(12345,9)
> setpriority(PRIO_PROCESS,12345,-20)
> sched_setscheduler(12345, SCHED_FIFO, &sp)
>
> Prior to the call being handled, the process may
> die and be replaced. Some random innocent process,
> or a not-so-innocent one, will get acted upon by
> mistake. This is broken and dangerous.
easy to fix: SIGSTOP the task, check it's really
the one you want and then do the setpriority /
setscheduler call and SIGCONT it. Any privileged
code that is about to spread some of its privileges
via asynchronous system-calls need to be careful.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-14 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-13 3:20 /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues Albert Cahalan
2004-09-13 7:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-13 14:11 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-09-13 14:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-13 14:51 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-14 2:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-23 13:13 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-24 16:02 ` Martin Mares
2004-09-23 13:11 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-13 7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-13 13:54 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-09-13 14:24 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-13 14:54 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-09-14 2:02 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-14 15:32 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2004-09-18 18:32 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-23 13:18 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-12 8:56 Anton Blanchard
2004-09-12 9:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-12 9:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-12 9:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-12 10:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-12 10:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-12 10:43 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-12 10:45 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-12 11:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-12 11:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-12 17:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-12 18:02 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-09-12 23:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-12 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-12 9:43 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-12 12:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-12 12:30 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-12 12:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-12 13:34 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-12 13:41 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040914153214.GA15558@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=albert@users.sf.net \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox