public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DervishD <lkml@dervishd.net>
To: Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen <bfg-kernel@blenning.no>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /proc/config reducing kernel image size
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:26:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040914172646.GA614@DervishD> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1095179606.11939.22.camel@host-81-191-110-70.bluecom.no>

    Hi Tom :)

 * Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen <bfg-kernel@blenning.no> dixit:
> There is no point in storing all the comments and unused options in the
> kernel image. This typically reduces the config size to about 1/5th
> before compressing, and to about 1/4th after compressing.

    I'm with you in that there is no point in storing the comments,
but I disagree about the unused options. Storing the unused options
as comments is more useful than it seems ;)

    Look at this example. You want to know if you have 'CONFIG_PNP'
enabled, so you do something like 'grep CONFIG_PMP /proc/config' (the
typo PNP->PMP is intended here). Of course that commands doesn't
print anything due to the typo. If you store the disabled options as
comments and a grep fails, you probably mispelled the config option,
or you're referring to a config option not present in your old
kernel, but if you remove them and you mispell the config option
there is no (automatic) way of knowing if you made a typo or if the
option is disabled. Any automatic search can, potentially, give you a
false negative.

    I'm not really sure about it, but I think that the unset options
are left as comments for the sake of automation. The space saving
doesn't (IMHO) worth the pain.

> I've also added the configuration option of how you want to compress it.

    Compression is always welcome, I suppose ;) Thanks for the idea.

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736
http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-14 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-14 16:33 /proc/config reducing kernel image size Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen
2004-09-14 17:26 ` DervishD [this message]
2004-09-14 17:36   ` Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen
2004-09-14 18:01     ` DervishD
2004-09-15 10:11       ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-14 17:44 ` Norberto Bensa
2004-09-14 17:57   ` Tom Fredrik Blenning Klaussen
2004-09-14 18:11     ` Norberto Bensa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040914172646.GA614@DervishD \
    --to=lkml@dervishd.net \
    --cc=bfg-kernel@blenning.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox