From: Greg Edwards <edwardsg@sgi.com>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@sgi.com>,
paulmck@us.ibm.com, "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
hawkes@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wli@holomorphy.com
Subject: Re: kernbench on 512p
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:43:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040914184327.GM4178@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41473578.7000106@colorfullife.com>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:16:24PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
| Greg Edwards wrote:
|
| >Manfred,
| >
| >Lockstat output attached from 2.6.9-rc2 at 512p and 2.6.9-rc2 + your two
| >remaining RCU patches at 512p. kernbench was run without any arguments.
| >
| >The difference for RCU looks great.
| >
| >
| >
| Which value did you use for RCU_GROUP_SIZE? I'm not sure what's the
| optimal value for 512p - probably 32 or so.
I used what was defined in the patch
+#define RCU_GROUP_SIZE 2
I can try running with a couple different values and see how it looks.
Greg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-14 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-19 16:16 kernbench on 512p Jesse Barnes
2004-08-19 16:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-19 16:29 ` David Mosberger
2004-08-19 16:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-19 16:40 ` David Mosberger
2004-08-19 17:55 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-20 7:53 ` David Mosberger
2004-08-19 18:25 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-19 18:42 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-19 21:11 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-19 21:24 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-19 21:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-20 19:36 ` Maneesh Soni
2004-08-19 23:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-08-20 0:16 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 15:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-08-20 17:24 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-20 19:22 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-08-20 20:19 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-08-23 21:23 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-23 23:13 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-10 19:01 ` Greg Edwards
2004-09-13 18:21 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-09-14 17:52 ` Greg Edwards
2004-09-14 18:16 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-09-14 18:43 ` Greg Edwards [this message]
2004-09-14 19:16 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-08-19 21:50 ` Ray Bryant
2004-08-19 22:00 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-19 23:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-20 17:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-20 0:56 ` remove dentry_open::file_ra_init_state() duplicated memset was " Marcelo Tosatti
2004-08-20 6:21 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-20 7:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-08-20 8:34 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040914184327.GM4178@sgi.com \
--to=edwardsg@sgi.com \
--cc=hawkes@sgi.com \
--cc=jbarnes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox