From: Tim Hockin <thockin@hockin.org>
To: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:49:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040915214919.GC22361@hockin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1095284369.23385.125.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com>
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 05:39:29PM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 23:38 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
> > Anyone can watch the refcount on the fs-modules, they increment on every
> > device claim. Is that a leak in your eyes too :)
>
> Haha, Kay, rocking point.
Not if I don't build my fs as a module? And yeah, in the strictest sense
it IS a leak if a user can do that.
Now, I'm not *really* concerned withs ecurity, I just want to make sure we
don't flippantly disregard it.
I'd be happy if the actual block device was not part of the event.
What worries me more is that only some mount/umount calls get events, and
not all of them.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-15 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-31 21:42 [patch] kernel sysfs events layer Robert Love
2004-08-31 21:56 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-31 21:58 ` Robert Love
[not found] ` <20040831150645.4aa8fd27.akpm@osdl.org>
2004-08-31 22:05 ` Robert Love
2004-09-02 8:34 ` Greg KH
2004-09-02 12:02 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-09-02 13:26 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-02 16:27 ` Robert Love
2004-09-02 20:29 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-02 12:49 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-02 16:25 ` Robert Love
2004-09-02 18:35 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-09-02 18:41 ` Robert Love
2004-09-04 0:54 ` Greg KH
2004-09-05 2:18 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-05 3:01 ` Robert Love
2004-09-05 2:58 ` Robert Love
2004-09-05 7:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-05 12:18 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-06 2:06 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-10 23:54 ` Greg KH
2004-09-11 0:18 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-11 0:48 ` Greg KH
2004-09-11 1:23 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-09-11 4:45 ` Robert Love
2004-09-11 1:45 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-11 16:56 ` Greg KH
2004-09-11 11:35 ` Dave Jones
2004-09-11 18:15 ` Greg KH
2004-09-11 4:09 ` Robert Love
2004-09-11 16:53 ` Greg KH
2004-09-13 14:45 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-15 0:07 ` Greg KH
2004-09-15 1:09 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-15 1:11 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-15 2:10 ` Robert Love
2004-09-15 3:17 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-15 3:42 ` Greg KH
2004-09-15 4:48 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-15 5:09 ` Greg KH
2004-09-15 6:21 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-15 6:45 ` Jan Dittmer
2004-09-15 6:47 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-15 6:50 ` Jan Dittmer
[not found] ` <20040915065515.GA11587@hockin.org>
2004-09-15 7:39 ` Jan Dittmer
2004-09-15 7:56 ` Paul Jackson
2004-09-15 8:32 ` Jan Dittmer
2004-09-15 14:24 ` Paul Jackson
2004-09-15 8:19 ` Karol Kozimor
2004-09-15 15:48 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-15 16:11 ` Jan Dittmer
2004-09-15 13:14 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-15 21:27 ` Greg KH
2004-09-15 9:07 ` Andrew Grover
2004-09-15 18:58 ` Robert Love
2004-09-15 3:48 ` Greg KH
2004-09-15 1:19 ` Robert Love
2004-09-15 3:44 ` Greg KH
2004-09-15 19:40 ` Greg KH
2004-09-15 20:10 ` Robert Love
2004-09-15 20:22 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-15 20:26 ` Robert Love
2004-09-15 20:31 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-15 20:33 ` Robert Love
2004-09-15 20:47 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-15 20:49 ` Robert Love
2004-09-15 20:56 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-15 21:01 ` Robert Love
2004-09-15 21:03 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-15 21:23 ` Greg KH
2004-09-15 21:26 ` Robert Love
2004-09-15 21:34 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-15 21:38 ` Robert Love
2004-09-16 1:21 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-16 4:08 ` Greg KH
2004-09-16 14:10 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-16 15:08 ` Greg KH
2004-09-16 18:33 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-15 21:35 ` Greg KH
2004-09-15 21:46 ` Tim Hockin
2004-09-15 21:47 ` Robert Love
2004-09-15 21:38 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-15 21:39 ` Robert Love
2004-09-15 21:49 ` Tim Hockin [this message]
2004-09-15 21:54 ` Greg KH
2004-09-15 20:34 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-15 21:21 ` Greg KH
2004-09-15 21:26 ` Robert Love
2004-09-15 21:34 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-15 21:35 ` Greg KH
2005-07-06 22:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2005-07-06 22:18 ` Greg KH
2004-09-05 3:59 ` Robert Love
2004-08-31 21:58 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-08-31 22:02 ` Robert Love
2004-08-31 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-31 22:00 ` Robert Love
2004-08-31 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-31 22:08 ` Robert Love
2004-09-01 2:05 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-09-01 10:07 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-02 20:45 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-09-02 22:15 ` Kay Sievers
2004-09-03 23:59 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-09-04 8:14 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040915214919.GC22361@hockin.org \
--to=thockin@hockin.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@novell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox