From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kkeil@suse.de
Subject: Re: [patch] tune vmalloc size
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:06:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040917220613.GA16920@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040917220340.GA2890@taniwha.stupidest.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 501 bytes --]
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 03:03:40PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 04:12:56PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > that is the case already
>
> why do we still use 128MB as a default then? this is way over-kill
> from what i can tell looking on what my machines use. i'd rather have
> this be a bit smaller and enable the slab/whatever to grow a little
> more
if you have an old glibc it will use ldt's which in turn use vmalloc for
threading... 128Mb is no luxury there.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-17 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2EHyq-5or-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-15 13:29 ` [patch] tune vmalloc size Andi Kleen
2004-09-15 14:05 ` Rodrigo FGV
2004-09-15 14:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-17 22:03 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-09-17 22:06 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2004-09-15 14:58 ` Karsten Keil
2004-09-15 15:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-09-15 12:53 Ingo Molnar
2004-09-15 12:31 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-15 13:29 ` Joe Korty
2004-09-15 13:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-15 13:40 ` Joe Korty
2004-09-15 14:14 ` Dave Jones
2004-09-15 13:40 ` Dave Jones
2004-09-15 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-15 21:45 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040917220613.GA16920@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=kkeil@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox