From: "David Gómez" <david@dervishd.net>
To: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OOM & [OT] util-linux-2.12e
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:11:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040920111158.GA7228@fargo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040920094602.GA24466@suse.de>
Hi Olaf ;),
> Andries, /etc/mtab is obsolete since the day when /proc/self/mounts was
> introduced. So, kill it today from your mount binary! TODAY. ...
>
> Then discuss what is still missing from /proc/self/mounts:
I agree with your approach Olaf. Better _fix_ first mount to remove
totally mtab support, and after put in /proc/self/mount the additional
info that previously only existed in /etc/mtab. Or i'm afraid that
it will never be removed...
Heck, i should learn myself some kernel programming and add the
new options to /proc/self/mounts. I'm really tired of having an
/etc/mtab file in my system...
bye
--
David Gómez
"The question of whether computers can think is just like the question of
whether submarines can swim." -- Edsger W. Dijkstra
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-20 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-19 22:05 OOM & [OT] util-linux-2.12e Andries.Brouwer
2004-09-20 9:46 ` Olaf Hering
2004-09-20 10:12 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-09-20 10:54 ` DervishD
2004-09-20 11:43 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-09-20 11:51 ` Paulo Marques
2004-09-20 12:11 ` DervishD
2004-09-20 12:14 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-09-20 12:00 ` DervishD
2004-09-20 10:23 ` Roman Zippel
2004-09-20 10:56 ` Olaf Hering
2004-09-20 11:16 ` Roman Zippel
2004-09-20 11:26 ` Olaf Hering
2004-09-20 11:38 ` Roman Zippel
2004-09-20 11:50 ` Olaf Hering
2004-09-20 12:02 ` Roman Zippel
2004-09-20 12:07 ` Olaf Hering
2004-09-20 12:14 ` Roman Zippel
2004-09-20 12:19 ` Olaf Hering
2004-09-20 12:34 ` Roman Zippel
2004-09-20 12:38 ` Olaf Hering
2004-09-20 12:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-09-20 12:54 ` Olaf Hering
2004-09-20 13:19 ` CaT
2004-09-20 13:33 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-09-20 13:15 ` CaT
2004-09-20 10:59 ` DervishD
2004-09-20 13:24 ` Helge Hafting
2004-09-20 13:21 ` Olaf Hering
2004-09-20 13:32 ` Helge Hafting
2004-09-20 14:12 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-21 7:20 ` Helge Hafting
2004-09-21 9:18 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-20 15:24 ` Tonnerre
2004-09-20 11:11 ` David Gómez [this message]
2004-09-20 11:06 ` DervishD
2004-09-20 11:38 ` Xavier Bestel
2004-09-20 11:59 ` DervishD
2004-09-20 12:32 ` Xavier Bestel
2004-09-20 14:16 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-21 16:45 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-09-21 21:26 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-09-22 17:05 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-09-22 18:39 ` Andries Brouwer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040920111158.GA7228@fargo \
--to=david@dervishd.net \
--cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olh@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox