From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266725AbUIVTPq (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:15:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266749AbUIVTPq (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:15:46 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:54023 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266725AbUIVTPo (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:15:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:15:41 +0100 From: Russell King To: Pierre Ossman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] MMC compatibility fix - GO_IDLE Message-ID: <20040922201541.G2347@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Pierre Ossman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <414C065A.7000602@drzeus.cx> <20040922151735.D2347@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <4151BA3F.8040406@drzeus.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <4151BA3F.8040406@drzeus.cx>; from drzeus-list@drzeus.cx on Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 07:45:35PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 07:45:35PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: > Russell King wrote: > >How about this patch? > > Looks ok. You sure we don't need to put all cards into an idle state > before issuing a new SEND_OP_COND? We aren't sending that to the existing cards - they are still in whatever state they were when they were previously detected. In addition, we aren't actually changing or detecting the operational conditions, we're merely informing the new cards about the existing setup. > Can a rescan be done while a card is in a selected state? Yes - any cards not already in idle state will ignore the command as intended. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core