From: Tonnerre <tonnerre@thundrix.ch>
To: Thomas Habets <thomas@habets.pp.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom_pardon, aka don't kill my xlock
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:45:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040923044549.GE6889@thundrix.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409230123.30858.thomas@habets.pp.se>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3889 bytes --]
Salut,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:23:08AM +0200, Thomas Habets wrote:
> diff -Nur linux-2.6.7.orig/CREDITS linux-2.6.7/CREDITS
> --- linux-2.6.7.orig/CREDITS 2004-06-16 07:19:43.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.7/CREDITS 2004-09-23 00:02:44.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1210,6 +1210,14 @@
> W: http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~ehaase
> D: Driver for the Commodore A2232 serial board
>
> +N: Thomas Habets
> +E: thomas@habets.pp.se
> +D: random Linux hacker
> +P: 1024D/AD48E854 A8A3 D1DD 4AE0 8467 7FDE 0945 286A E90A AD48 E854
> +S: Tunnlandsvägen 40
> +S: 168 36 Bromma
> +S: Sweden
> +
> N: Bruno Haible
> E: haible@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de
> D: SysV FS, shm swapping, memory management fixes
That should be D: OOM killer exceptions or whatever, I suppose.
> diff -Nur linux-2.6.7.orig/kernel/sysctl.c linux-2.6.7/kernel/sysctl.c
> --- linux-2.6.7.orig/kernel/sysctl.c 2004-06-16 07:18:58.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.7/kernel/sysctl.c 2004-09-23 00:28:51.000000000 +0200
> @@ -795,6 +795,15 @@
> .strategy = &sysctl_intvec,
> .extra1 = &zero,
> },
> + {
> + .ctl_name = VM_OOM_PARDON,
> + .procname = "oom_pardon",
> + .data = &vm_oom_pardon,
> + .maxlen = sizeof(vm_oom_pardon),
> + .mode = 0644,
> + .proc_handler = &proc_doutsstring,
> + .strategy = &sysctl_string,
> + },
> { .ctl_name = 0 }
> };
>
A sysctl is a bad implementation since you can only store one single
string in it.
> diff -Nur linux-2.6.7.orig/mm/oom_kill.c linux-2.6.7/mm/oom_kill.c
> --- linux-2.6.7.orig/mm/oom_kill.c 2004-06-16 07:19:29.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.7/mm/oom_kill.c 2004-09-23 00:31:12.000000000 +0200
> @@ -16,14 +16,56 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/utsname.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/swap.h>
> #include <linux/timex.h>
> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>
> +char vm_oom_pardon[VM_OOM_PARDON_LEN];
> /* #define DEBUG */
>
> /**
> + * For the love of kbaek, don't kill processes in /proc/sys/vm/oom_pardon
> + */
> +static int pardon(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + static char buf[256];
That 256 should be VM_OOM_PARDON_LEN ?
> + const struct qstr *exe;
> + const char *p;
> + int len;
> +
> + exe = &task->proc_dentry->d_name;
> + len = min((int)exe->len, (int)(sizeof(buf) - 2));
Dito.
> + memcpy(buf, exe->name, len);
> + buf[len] = 0;
> + buf[len+1] = 0;
> +
> + if (strchr(buf, ' ')) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + down_read(&uts_sem);
We're under the task lock, and you want us to sleep here? There's a
little problem: we'd want to switch the task, and since the task lock
is taken, we'll wait an infinite amount of time (yes, literally!) for
it to become free.
> + p = vm_oom_pardon;
> + do {
> + buf[len] = ' ';
> + if (!strncmp(p, buf, len)) {
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + buf[len] = 0;
> + if (!strcmp(p, buf)) {
> + return 1;
> + }
> + p = strchr(p, ' ');
> + } while(p++);
What about programs with spaces in its names?
Actually, I'd really use a different interface to register and
unregister processes to protect. And maybe not (just) by the binary
name. Make a real filter list, or track them by pid.
> + up_read(&uts_sem);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * oom_badness - calculate a numeric value for how bad this task has been
> * @p: task struct of which task we should calculate
> *
Tonnerre
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-23 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-22 23:23 [PATCH] oom_pardon, aka don't kill my xlock Thomas Habets
2004-09-23 0:01 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-23 0:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-23 4:45 ` Tonnerre [this message]
2004-09-23 6:57 ` Thomas Habets
2004-09-23 12:24 ` Tonnerre
2004-09-23 13:32 ` Thomas Habets
2004-09-23 23:45 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-09-24 13:19 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-24 19:58 ` Thomas Habets
2004-09-24 21:15 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-25 10:08 ` Thomas Habets
2004-09-27 10:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-27 12:54 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-27 13:12 ` Jon Masters
2004-09-27 12:36 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-27 13:35 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-27 15:59 ` Jon Masters
2004-09-27 17:12 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-27 16:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-28 13:33 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-28 12:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-28 23:55 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-27 23:07 ` Jon Masters
2004-09-29 0:49 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-09-24 14:07 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-24 22:57 ` Jon Masters
2004-09-25 16:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-27 12:00 Thomas Habets
2004-09-27 12:17 ` Jon Masters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040923044549.GE6889@thundrix.ch \
--to=tonnerre@thundrix.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas@habets.pp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox