public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Warn people that ipchains and ipfwadm are going away.
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:25:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040923162535.4ccb32a4.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1CAchB-0004VU-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:08:13 +0100
Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

> Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net> wrote:
> 
> > Who is doing a 32-bit userland on x86-64, and WTF for?
> > Why do they not also run a 32-bit kernel?
> 
> Debian will be shipping a 32-bit userland with a 64-bit kernel. The
> reasons are long, awkward, and mostly uninteresting. The reason for
> shipping a 64-bit kernel is that it makes it easier for users who
> require large quantities of VM to obtain it.

But just like the sparc64 port, there is a 64-bit userland
compilation environment available, and debian has the means
to ship 64-bit specific packages on top of a mostly 32-bit
userland.  So it is very easy for them to ship a 64-bit
netfilter utility package if they wanted to.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-23 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-23 18:07 [PATCH] Warn people that ipchains and ipfwadm are going away Albert Cahalan
2004-09-23 19:33 ` Chris Friesen
2004-09-23 19:36   ` Albert Cahalan
2004-09-23 19:57     ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-09-23 19:57     ` David S. Miller
2004-09-23 23:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2004-09-23 23:25   ` David S. Miller [this message]
     [not found] <2GFBZ-61e-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <2GSfS-6eW-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <2H0ZO-49v-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <2HdDL-48z-53@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <2HdNp-4eJ-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-22 12:15         ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-22 14:04           ` David Woodhouse
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-20 23:09 Rusty Russell (IBM)
2004-09-21 12:36 ` Marc Ballarin
2004-09-21 21:58   ` Rusty Russell
2004-09-21 22:36     ` Marc Ballarin
2004-09-21 22:36       ` David S. Miller
2004-09-21 23:35         ` Marc Ballarin
2004-09-22  0:16           ` Patrick McHardy
2004-09-22 13:37             ` Marc Ballarin
2004-09-22 13:58               ` Jesper Juhl
2004-09-22 14:13                 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-09-22 11:36     ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-09-22 11:47       ` Martin Josefsson
2004-09-22 12:05         ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-09-22 12:41           ` Gene Heskett
2004-09-22 14:19           ` Fao, Sean
2004-09-22 15:31           ` William Stearns
2004-09-22 11:52       ` James Courtier-Dutton
2004-09-22 11:55       ` Marc Ballarin
2004-09-21 17:57 ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040923162535.4ccb32a4.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox